Processing may take a few seconds...



The military-geographical significance of the Suwałki Gap


[ 1 ] Katedra Historii Wojskowości i Studiów Nad Obronnością, Instytut Historii Wojskowej, Akademia Sztuki Wojennej | [ P ] employee

Scientific discipline (Law 2.0)

[1.3] History

Year of publication


Published in

Security and Defence Quarterly

Journal year: 2017 | Journal volume: vol. 17 | Journal number: no 4

Article type

scientific article

Publication language


  • NATO
  • Geografia wojenna
  • Regiony geostrategiczne
  • Polska
  • Przesmyk suwalski
  • Rosja
  • National security
  • Military activities
  • The Suwałki Gap

EN Dynamic changes in the security environment are forcing us to reflect on the shape of the international order at the end of the second decade of the 21st century. The aggressive policy of the Russian Federation, which is confirmed by the conflict with Georgia in 2008 and the current situation in Ukraine, indicates that the use of military violence in the resolution of international disputes is not a historical category at all. This is of particular importance to the geopolitical location of the Republic of Poland. The length of our land border with the Russian Federation is 210 km, while with Belarus it is 418 km. The above fact has a fundamental impact not only on the public debate on the security of our country and the region, but also, and perhaps most importantly, on the shape of defence policy and the content of planning possible measures to prevent and counteract the escalation of prospective tensions in NATO-Russia relations. Both Russian military doctrine and the opinions expressed by politicians and specialists dealing with military issues and political and military experts indicate that, from the Russian perspective, the Baltic States’ membership of the North Atlantic Alliance and the presence of NATO troops on the territory of these countries, is highly unfavourable. Therefore, there are grounds to believe that countries such as Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, are treated by Russia as natural bridgeheads, convenient for bringing possible strikes against Russia. Therefore, it is possible that blocking communication routes leading to these countries, while cutting them off from the support of allied land forces, may prove to be a key success factor in the situation of a hypothetical armed conflict, aimed not only at depriving these countries of their sovereignty, but also aimed at discrediting the power of the Alliance.

Pages (from - to)

3 - 20



License type

CC BY-NC-ND (attribution - noncommercial - no derivatives)

Open Access Mode

open journal

Open Access Text Version

final published version

Points of MNiSW / journal


Points of MNiSW / journal in years 2017-2021