W zależności od ilości danych do przetworzenia generowanie pliku może się wydłużyć.

Jeśli generowanie trwa zbyt długo można ograniczyć dane np. zmniejszając zakres lat.

Artykuł

Pobierz plik Pobierz BibTeX

Tytuł

The securitization of foreign disinformation

Autorzy

[ 1 ] School for International Studies, Simon Fraser University, Hastings St, V6J4Y2, Vancouver, Canada

Rok publikacji

2024

Opublikowano w

Security and Defence Quarterly

Rocznik: 2024 | Tom: vol. 46 | Numer: no. 2

Typ artykułu

artykuł naukowy

Język publikacji

angielski

Słowa kluczowe
EN
  • Securitisation
  • Russian disinformation
  • Information manipulation
  • Responses to foreign disinformation
  • Canada and the war in Ukraine
PL
  • Agresja rosyjska na Ukrainę (2022)
  • Dezinformacja
  • Fake news
  • Kanada
  • Rosja
Streszczenie

EN This paper analyses the Canadian government’s foreign and security policy responses to Russian disinformation in the context of the Russo-Ukrainian war. It asks whether, how, and why the government has securitised the “crisis of Russian disinformation.” The paper first briefly reviews literature on the Copenhagen’s School’s “securitisation” theory and how it has been used to explain responses to other crises. It then adopts the framework to contextualise the Canadian federal government’s official rhetoric, and then to categorise government policies and actions. The sources consulted include government actors’ reports and stated intentions and policies from 2022 to 2024. Adopting a securitisation framework reveals that Russian disinformation has been rhetorically securitised by government actors as an existential threat to national security and democratic integrity which requires urgent action. Within a context of cascading risks, the government has taken a range of distinct yet reinforcing policies and actions, some more comprehensive than others. The paper argues that together this “pervasive rhetorical securitisation” and “ad hoc practical securitisation” comprise the Canadian government’s ongoing process of partial securitisation. This process is legitimising different methods of governance: security and warfare communications (to address threats to national defence and security), democratic resilience (to address threats to democracy), and, most controversially, blocking and sanctioning (to signal discontent to the Russian regime). The analysis further reveals that each approach has different benefits and limits. The paper concludes that the securitisation process is incomplete compared to the government's rhetoric, with no over-arching organisation or strategy. It outlines implications for future research.

Strony (od-do)

118 - 138

URL

https://securityanddefence.pl/pdf-190799-113019?filename=The%20securitization%20of.pdf

Typ licencji

CC BY (uznanie autorstwa)

Tryb otwartego dostępu

otwarte czasopismo

Wersja tekstu w otwartym dostępie

ostateczna wersja opublikowana

Data udostępnienia

30.06.2024

Pełny tekst artykułu

Pobierz plik

Poziom dostępu do pełnego tekstu

publiczny

Punktacja Ministerstwa / czasopismo

70