Birdwatchers on social media: The mediatisation of intelligence organisations
[ 1 ] Faculty of Military Sciences, Netherlands Defence Academy, Hogeschoollaan 2, 4818 CR, Breda, The Netherlands | [ 2 ] Law of Armed Conflict and Military Operations – ACIL, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV, Amsterdam,The Netherlands
2025
scientific article
english
- Intelligence
- Social media
- Ukraine
- Virtual reality
- War
- Izrael
- Media społecznościowe
- Rzeczywistość wirtualna
- Ukraina
- Wielka Brytania
- Wojna
- Wywiad
EN War has always affected the physical and cognitive dimensions of life; however, recent developments in Ukraine and Gaza have increased the emphasis on warfare making use of the virtual realm. Military actions now extend beyond traditional battlefields, significantly impacting virtual and cognitive dimensions through cyberspace and social media. This study examines how intelligence and security services in Ukraine, Israel, and the United Kingdom employ mediatisation—the process whereby mass media shapes public discourse—to achieve their objectives in modern warfare. Through comparative analysis of these three intelligence landscapes, the research explores how these organisations, despite being part of larger national security systems, pursue their own organisational interests. The study reveals that intelligence services use mediatisation for multiple purposes: engaging citizens, justifying operations, and projecting strength to domestic and international audiences. The results show a marked shift from secretive practices to open, public-facing communication strategies. The UK Defence Intelligence provides daily situational updates, the Israel Defence Forces Spokesperson’s Unit releases sensitive intelligence to shape narratives, and Ukrainian military intelligence publishes intercepted communications to undermine adversaries. This selective disclosure via social media represents a significant departure from conventional secrecy, reflecting the growing importance of information warfare. While this approach offers benefits in shaping narratives and countering adversaries, it poses risks to operational security. The study underscores the complex balance that intelligence agencies must strike between transparency and protecting sources and methods in the digital age, highlighting how communication serves as a tool for informing the public, justifying actions and discrediting adversaries.
1 - 21
Corresponding author Peter Schrijver Faculty of Military Sciences, Netherlands Defence Academy, Hogeschoollaan 2, 4818 CR, Breda, Netherlands
CC BY (attribution alone)
open journal
final published version
31.03.2025
public
70