W zależności od ilości danych do przetworzenia generowanie pliku może się wydłużyć.

Jeśli generowanie trwa zbyt długo można ograniczyć dane np. zmniejszając zakres lat.

Artykuł

Pobierz plik Pobierz BibTeX

Tytuł

Israeli public diplomacy following targeting campaigns : A rhetorical analysis of the Al-Jalaa Tower strike in Gaza

Autorzy

[ 1 ] Department of Regional and Global Studies, Uniwersytet Warszawski | [ 2 ] Department of Finance, University of Texas at San Antonio, 24245 Wilderness Oaks, 78258, San Antonio, TX, United States

Rok publikacji

2025

Opublikowano w

Security and Defence Quarterly

Rocznik: 2025 | Numer: Online first

Typ artykułu

artykuł naukowy

Język publikacji

polski

Słowa kluczowe
PL
EN
Streszczenie

EN This study investigates how states use public diplomacy to defend their legitimacy following contested military actions. Focusing on Israel’s airstrike on the Al-Jalaa Tower during the 2021 Gaza conflict, the research examines how rhetorical strategies were employed to manage international criticism and sustain normative legitimacy. Unlike prior research that addresses entire conflicts, this study narrows its focus to a single high-profile event involving protected objects. Drawing on Ben D. Mor’s rhetorical defence framework, the study applies qualitative discourse and rhetorical analysis to a dataset of 57 official statements, including government press releases, speeches, media briefings, and verified social media posts issued within 5 months after the incident. Each statement was coded thematically into three rhetorical strategies, blame avoidance, blame imposition, and moral differentiation, and analysed across temporal distribution, source diversity, and target orientation. The findings reveal that Israel’s public diplomacy reflected a layered rhetorical defence dominated by blame avoidance and blame imposition, often deployed in tandem to deflect criticism, justify actions, and redirect moral responsibility towards Hamas and third-party critics. Moral differentiation served as reinforcement for Israel’s self-presentation as a rule-abiding democracy acting within legal and ethical bounds. The study concludes that in contested military action, public diplomacy functions less as a means of persuasion and more as a communicative mechanism for managing reputational risk and contesting narratives of legitimacy. By demonstrating how rhetorical strategies evolve and interact under normative pressure, the research contributes to a deeper understanding of the strategic role of wartime communication in asymmetric warfare and legitimacy management.

Data udostępnienia online

28.12.2025

URL

https://securityanddefence.pl/Israeli-public-diplomacy-following-targeting-campaigns-A-rhetorical-analysis-of-the,211794,0,2.html

Typ licencji

CC BY (uznanie autorstwa)

Tryb otwartego dostępu

otwarte czasopismo

Wersja tekstu w otwartym dostępie

ostateczna wersja opublikowana

Data udostępnienia

28.12.2025

Pełny tekst artykułu

Pobierz plik

Poziom dostępu do pełnego tekstu

publiczny

Punktacja Ministerstwa / czasopismo

70